|
C Raja Mohan recommends that
"India take over the leadership role from
London because, as a rising power, it can influence
the Commonwealth's economic prospects, offering
technical, economic and security aid to the smallest
states"*. Indeed, the Commonwealth benefits
from the demographic dividend by having India
as one of its member states - a high proportion
of its population is young which is vital for
brand longevity. In geographic terms, having Canada
and Australia as member states means that the
Commonwealth covers a large proportion of the
globe and having tiny states like Malta and Tuvalu
ensures a diversity of need.
Sheikh Hasina, Prime Minister
of the Government of the People's Republic of
Bangladesh, said "The strength of our Commonwealth
lies in its unity of vision of pluralism, liberalism,
democracy and political institutions amid the
diversity in race, ethnicity and religion."
And therein lies the brand dilemma. Seen as largely
political and ceremonial, few people consider
the Commonwealth as an organisation for economic
progress. Little surprise than that it is led
by a retired Indian Diplomat to help carry out
Her Majesty The Queen's formal, ceremonial duties.
Commonwealth Enterprise Partnerships
But consider the possibilities.
What if the organisation were to form The Commonwealth
Enterprise Partnership, allowing for a free flow
of goods between member states with no paperwork
or levies; had a Commonwealth currency and significantly
invested in encouraging bilateral trade among
small businesses in member states? Would this
not help revive interest and revitalise the brand?
Creating a Commonwealth technical standard for
goods and services could create a market large
enough for innovative new products from member
states. And a "Common Market" of 1.8
billion customers would help the Commonwealth
compete with emerging nations like Brazil, Russia
and China.
Historically, the UK has
commercially chosen to align itself with Europe,
but exploring the possibilities of alignment with
the Commonwealth may give rise to new opportunities.
In the brand terms, the words "common"
and "wealth" are easily understood and
meaningful to all the organisation's customers
- the people. So extension of the Commonwealth
brand could be readily achieved relatively economically
and it would have nearly fifty years of brand
loyalty behind it.
Commonwealth Court of Justice
Establishing a Commonwealth
Court and aligning each member state's jurisdiction
to the Commonwealth could at a stroke help capitalise
on the intellectual property of individuals and
businesses in the form of trademark and patent
protection whilst also increasing the depth of
the democratic rule to member states struggling
to redefine their own constitutional parameters.
The Commonwealth brand since
its inception has been wedded to politics and
so perhaps repositioning the brand into areas
like the economy, the environment, health and
education would help revitalise the brand. The
Commonwealth has several gems in its treasure
chest: the Commonwealth Games are a flagship established
sporting event allowing athletes who may not qualify
for the Olympics to participate; the Commonwealth
Foundation helps provide access to opportunity
and the Commonwealth of Learning focuses on educational
opportunities. Add the cultural activities of
organisations like The British Council, for example,
into the melting pot and the creative and entertainment
industries could help lead the revitalisation
of the Commonwealth brand which already has a
great deal of brand equity to its name.
The Commonwealth: a 21st Century
brand?
Part of the revitalisation
would involve organisational change: the CEO would
need to be drawn from the young, dynamic and diverse
business communities the Commonwealth serves and
even the role of The Queen as its head needs discussion
- perhaps a Patron drawn periodically from among
the Member States might endear the Commonwealth
brand to its customers more and help blow away
the cobwebs of its historical colonial past to
boot. And of course, the issue of self-government
versus the Commonwealth would need to be a topic
of ongoing debate and discussion.
As a brand the Commonwealth
has all the key ingredients: brand loyalty, longevity,
solid brand values, market penetration and reach.
Whether it can be revitalised into a brand for
the 21st Century remains open for discussion.
References:
*
Could India co-lead the Commonwealth? (from
John Elliott's Blog)
About The Commonwealth
The Commonwealth was founded
after the London Declaration of April 1949. Today's
Commonwealth is an association of 53 countries.
Its 1.8 billion citizens, about 30 percent of
the world's population, are drawn from the broadest
range of faiths, races, cultures and traditions.
Members range from vast countries like Canada
to small island states like Malta; from India,
the largest democracy in the world, with more
than one billion people, to Tuvalu, with its population
of about 11,000.
The Commonwealth Secretariat,
established in 1965 is the main intergovernmental
agency of the Commonwealth, facilitating consultation
and co-operation among member governments and
countries. The Commonwealth Secretariat is headed
by the Commonwealth Secretary General and is located
at Marlborough House in London. Its sister inter-governmental
organisations are the Commonwealth Foundation
(also based at Marlborough House) and the Commonwealth
of Learning (in Vancouver, Canada).
The work of the Secretariat
is guided by the decisions of Heads of Government
and governing bodies. It responds to global developments
and the needs of member countries and its activities
are results-oriented. The Commonwealth Secretariat's
Strategic Plan and work programme is directed
by the mandates set by Commonwealth Heads of Government,
who meet every two years.
The Secretariat is governed
by a Board of Governors on which all eligible
member governments are represented. The Board
meets annually in May to review the Secretariat's
work and approve its future and budget.
The Board is supported by
an Executive Committee. The Executive Committee
meets on a quarterly basis to monitor the implementation
of the Secretariat's work programme. The Executive
Committee comprises the eight largest contributors
to the Secretariat's total resources, plus two
members from each region of the Commonwealth:
Africa; Asia-Mediterranean; the Caribbean and
the South Pacific.
Visit www.thecommonwealth.org
for further information..
Top |